|
Warning:
links will open in a new browser window!
|
No
columns on 16,23 or 30 December
(well, a chap has to have a holiday sometime!) |
Links
for column of 09
December 2001
....................................................... |
| Chris
Raettig's account of how he came to create the corporate anthems
site is here.
He has also added the
story of his communications with KPMG.
For an MP3 of the KPMG anthem try here
(though I suspect that even as you read their lawyers are trying to
get it removed). |
Wired
had a
good report about the story.
The KPMG 'disclaimer' is here. |
Column
of 02
December 2001
........................................... |
Links
for column of 25
November 2001
....................................................... |
| For
details of The Myth of the Paperless Office, see here. |
|
Links
for column of 18 November 2001
......................................................... |
|
| S.A.
Mathieson has a
very useful article on the proposed new legislation in Guardian
Online.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the
Pond, the authorities are also
writing themselves blank cheques, regardless of the impact on
civil liberties. |
The
text of the new 'Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security' Bill is here.
For information about the
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, see the Foundation
for Information Policy Research. |
No column for 11 November 2001
................................................ |
Links
for column of 04
November 2001
................................................................... |
| There
is quite a lot of practical advice on managing e-mail available on
the Web. Here's a piece entitled "Managing the E-Mail Explosion"
for example. There's some
good stuff on LearnTheNet. The University of Texas
librarians have also taken
a long look at how to manage e-mail records in the longer term
-- a big problem for many companies. |
Thanks
to Ian Stevenson for this quote from the IEE News 01-02-96:"It
is a strange paradox that the infotech revolution is making it
harder to communicate. As the cost, in terms of time, effort or
money, of sending a message approaches
zero, the number of messages sent will approach infinity. As the
number of messages approaches infinity the time available to
consider each approaches zero. At the limit an infinite number of
messages will be dispatched and receive zero attention. You may
think this logic is flawed but there are already those who are only
too well aware that the easier it is to communicate the harder it is
to get any one to listen, They are people who work in the junk mail
business." |
Some
'data' about e-mail (garnered from Gerry
McGovern's newsletter):
* In September 2001, IDC predicted that there will be 1.2 billion
email mailboxes by 2005, up from 505 million in 2000. It also
predicted that by 2005 there will be 36 billion person-to-person
emails sent worldwide every day.
* In July 2001, Ferris Research predicted that 2001 would see a 50
percent rise in the number of emails business users would receive,
with further growth of between 35-50 percent during 2002.
* In July 2001, a Gartner study stated that business users receive
an average of 22 email messages a day, and spend an average of 49
minutes every day managing their email. Gartner stated that much
email is not relevant. It compared unproductive email to,
"being killed by friendly fire. It's like carbon monoxide. It's
colorless, odorless".
* In May 2001, Support.com published a survey of IT professionals
globally which found that email software caused the more problems
than any other software application.
Even
before the current crisis, the US Congress was drowning in
e-mail. According
to one Congressional task force, "First, the volume of e-mail to congressional offices has risen dramatically
over the past two years. The number of e-mail messages reaching the House
of Representatives, for example, rose from 20 million in 1998 to 48 million
in 2000, and it continues to grow by an average of one million messages per
month. The heavy e-mail traffic generated by the recent nomination of John
Ashcroft as U.S. Attorney General slowed Senate servers to a crawl, causing
delays in e-mail delivery that lasted hours - and, in some cases, days. This
flood of e-mail has been fueled by the ease and speed of online communications,
the electorate's growing interest in national politics, and the grassroots
activities of lobbyists and e-businesses that are electronically motivating
the public to 'make their voices heard in Washington.' Unfortunately, these
advocacy organizations are also encouraging the public to engage in e-mail
practices - like spamming congressional offices - that result in unmanageable
demands on Congress."
|
Links
for columns of 21
October 2001 and 28 October 2001
.................................................................................... |
| For
information on the alternatives to Microsoft software, see Living
Without Microsoft. |
The
Guardian also ran a
useful piece by SA Mathieson on some alternatives to Microsoft
programs. |
For
the grisly details of how XP's 'product activation' works, see here. |
Guy
Clapperton has
written about how the new Microsoft licensing system will affect
small businesses. And here
is the report on what UK Big Business thinks about it |
Links
for column of 14
October 2001
................................................... |
Eavesdropping
on search engines:
Metaspy
provides a window into MetaCrawler.
Questioning of Search.com can be observed here.
And you can peek at what people are asking AskJeeves.com by clicking
here.
Google's Zeitgeist
page provides an on-going summary of what people are interested
in. |
Google's
Zeitgeist page for the week of the attacks is archived here.
There is a fascinating
article in First Monday, a peer-reviewed online journal,
which discusses the significance of Google in the aftermath of the
attacks.
|
The
Pew Internet report on how US citizens used the Net to react to the
WTC attacks is here. |
Jon
Katz wrote a characteristically
interesting essay on Slashdot arguing that 'The Net is
now our serious news medium'. |
Links
for column of 07
October 2001
.................................................... |
| Lovely
piece in the Economist about Blair's Churchill Lite
act. Excerpt: 'It
was always understood that New Labour was saving the big stuff for
its second term. Voters had been primed to expect Mr Blair to
organise a transport initiative here, a public-private partnership
there. Some worthwhile changes had been expected in the |
procedures
for adopting children. There might even be a referendum on joining
the euro. But this—this is ridiculous. The only plausible
explanation for Mr Blair's planet-transforming peroration from
Brighton is that the poor man has let the war against terrorism go
to his head.
Worst of all, Mr Blair thinks it all hangs together.' |
For
background on the SSSCA see here
and here.
The text of the Bill is here. |
In
an interesting new
book, Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual
Property and How It Threatens Creativity, Siva Vaidhyanathan
presents a clear and historically based argument against the push to
transform American intellectual property law into a new zone of zero
tolerance. |
Links
for column of 30 September 2001
........................................................ |
| Jack
Straw's carpet-chewing outburst can
be heard on the Radio 4 Today site, thanks to the miracle
of RealAudio. (But remember you will need to download and
install the free
Real Player software to listen to it.)
For everything you ever wanted to
know about the RIP Act see the
FIPR archive.
|
According
to this
piece by Duncan Campbell in the Guardian, the WTC
terrorists made extensive use of unencrypted email, precisely
because they knew that encrypted communications might have triggered
an alarm. |
The
rumour that Bin Laden & Co. use steganographic
techniques was
first reported in USA Today, but doubts have been cast on
the conjecture by
one academic study. (Note: you will need free Acrobat
Reader software to read this report.)
|
Apart
from the civil liberties objections to the burgeoning surveillance
craze, there is the argument that wall-to-wall surveillance simply
won't work. At a
conference in London this week, security expert Bruce Schneier
made this point forcefully. "The Stasi collected data on
four million East Germans, roughly one fourth of their
population", he reminded his audience. "Yet they failed to
predict the fall of the Berlin Wall because they invested too
heavily in data collection and too little in data interpretation and
human intelligence". |
Links
for column of 23
September 2001
........................................................ |
| Examples
of sloppy reporting of the Nimda threat. Here's a BBC report: New
virus infects the internet. "A new computer worm has
spread quickly via the internet, assaulting not only personal
computers but network servers as well.." . Note: no
mention of Microsoft in the opening para. And here's Wired
-- an outfit which ought to know better -- making
the same mistake with a piece headlined Scary Hybrid Internet
Worm Loose. |
Interesting
review of Windows vs. Linux as a desktop system. Carried out by
a consultant for a commercial client, the conclusion was that the
client's organisation could get the same functionality and save
$10,000 on its IT costs. Wonder when this penny will drop with the
UK's Microsoft-obsessed public authorities. |
Here
is Steve
Gibson's account of the security holes in Windows XP.
|
Here
is David
Pogue's review of Windows XP. |
Links
for column of 16
September 2001
........................................................ |
| Wired
had an
interesting story about how ordinary people used the Net to
communicate and in the process provided a new kind of coverage that
we haven't ever seen before. |
Some
sites gathered eyewitness
accounts. And here is a
page constructed entirely from images sent from all over the
world by ordinary web users. (Thanks to Quentin
Stafford-Fraser for this.)
|
I
received this astonishing e-mail
from Jonathan Wallace on Wednesday.
The Internet Archive in
collaboration with Alexa Internet, and SUNY, Library of Congress and
UWashington is
archiving pages and sites relating to the terrorist attacks in
the NY and DC. Where we are archiving sites and pages all the time,
we are concentrating the crawlers to make sure there is a solid
historical record of this time.
|
And,
as I said, the Net didn't fall apart under the strain. Quite
the reverse, in fact. There are a lot of ways of measuring
Internet performance, of course, but here's a
graph from one of the monitoring services which shows how
packet-loss rates changed over the critical days.
Nice to see that, the morning after
my column was published, the New York Times agreed.
Great minds etc...
|
Links
for column of 09
September 2001
........................................................ |
| 802.11b
technology has now got to the point of being a consumer product. The
Wireless
Ethernet Compatability Alliance -- the nearest thing 802.11b has
to an industrial consortium -- lists 47 companies (including some
major players like Dell, Intel, Compaq and HP) which offer 802.11b
products. Boxed 'Starter sets' for home networks are now sold by
high street retailers like Dixons and PC World. |
The
WECA site has some useful
resources, including some
technical papers on the technology (for which you will need
Adobe Acrobat Reader -- available free from Adobe).
Here's
an
innovative ISP in Maine which is using 802.11b to provide
broadband access to customers who are beyond the reach of ADSL or
cable. Other companies doing much the same thing include one
with the evocative name GetOnTheAir.com!
The
company providing access in Starbucks is MobileStar.
|
I
use Orinoco
kit, but the nicest implementation is Apple Airport
technology. Every iMac and iBook comes with a built-in
802.11b antenna (you just have to add a card).
Security is an issue because it's
easy (by definition) to eavesdrop on a wireless network. The
technology comes with two levels of encryption, but many users don't
even bother to use that, as this
article suggests. And there's been some recent research
suggesting that the built-in encryption can relatively easily be
broken.
|
My
guess is that the built-in encryption provides enough security for
ordinary domestic use. I wouldn't use it if I were a law firm or a
bank. But then they can afford 'proper' wired networking!
For me, though, the most exciting
thing about 802.11b is its possibilities for community use. My
interest in it was first sparked by this
article in Salon. The Seattle
Wireless project is a typical example of how enlightened techies
are using their expertise to widen broadband access to people who
cannot afford ADSL or cable modem charges. And the movement towards
these 'symbiotic networks' continues
to grow. |
Links
for column of 26
August 2001
............................................... |
| Salon
(which is based in San Francisco) was in a great position to keep
tabs on the dot-com boom. Here's a
lovely piece about the rise of the 'asset auction' business
following the crash. "What", wonders the reporter,
wandering through the lots on sale, "did they do with this
stuff?" |
Here's
Amy
Standen's article on the dot-com Aeron fetish.
And a useful quote from John
Maynard Keynes. "Markets can remain irrational longer
than you can remain solvent". |
And
if you really want to buy a Herman Miller chair, try here. |
Links
for column of 19 August 2001
.................................................. |
| Ed
Yourdon wrote a
nice little piece summarising what he saw as the essence of Fred
Brooks's achievement.
Fred's home page is here. |
The
Mythical Man-Month is published by Addison Wesley. The
publication details are here.
After 25 years, Brooks produced a revised and expanded edition. |
Here
are some
short excerpts from Chapter 1. And there's a useful brief
summary of each chapter here.
But in the end the only thing to do is get the book and read it for
yourself. |
Links
for column of 12 August 2001
..................................................... |
| IBM
has a
tribute to the PC on its site. |
The
San Jose Mercury News (Silicon Valley's local newspaper) ran a
nice series reflecting on the two decades of the IBM PC. |
There
was a
nice piece in the LA Times reminding us that 1981 was
also the year when Apple began work on the really revolutionary
personal computer -- the Macintosh. |
Links
for Column of 05 August 2001
.................................... |
StarOffice
can be downloaded from
here -- but it's such a huge download that you'd be better
paying around £30 for a CD containing all the software.
Dan Gillmor, the distinguished
technology columnist of the San Jose Mercury News has been running an
interesting discussion about what's involved in living without
Microsoft software. |
The
company that is developing AbiWord is here.
The current version is 0.9.0. and you can download it free
from here.
Paul Maritz, Microsoft's senior vice-president of platforms and
applications, described it under oath as a "very high-quality
word processor"! But that was when he was hoping to persuade
Judge Jackson that Microsoft faced serious competition, so perhaps
one should take the claim with a pinch of salt. AbiWord
still lacks some important features of MS Word, but it's getting
there. |
Links
for column of 29
July 2001
.............................................. |
Here's
the New York Times report
of Dmitry Sklyarov's arrest, and the same paper's account of how
Adobe started
to back off.
Here's the Wired story
of the arrest.
You can download the PowerPoint
file of Sklyarov's Defcon presentation from here. |
Some
time ago, Larry Lessig wrote a
wonderful essay on the Alice in Wonderland licencing terms Adobe
tried to impose on its e-book of Alice in Wonderland -- which
originally included the stipulation that the e-book was not to be
read aloud!
Here's the
text of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. |
The
'Boycott Adobe' site is already up
and running. And if you decide that you do not wish to use
Adobe PhotoShop (or just can't afford the £550 it costs), why not
try the Open Source (and free) alternative -- the
GIMP? It does more or less everything PhotoShop does, and for
some tasks is actually better. The curious name stands for
'Graphical Image Manipulation Program'. |
Links
for column of 22
July 2001
........................................... |
| Doc
Searls is one of my favourite Internet commentators. Here's his
take on Passport and Hailstorm from his column in Linux
Journal. His title: "Whose hand is that in your
pocket?" |
The
best
critical piece I've been able to locate on the architecture and
implications of Hailstorm is written by the inimitable Clay
Shirky. The title says it all: "Hailstorm: Open Web
Services Controlled by Microsoft". |
Microsoft's
White
Paper (tech jargon for technical outline) on Hailstorm
makes fascinating reading.
Larry Lessig, a long-term and perceptive critic of Microsoft, has
argued in
his column in the Industry Standard, that there are tensions
within the company which could eventually induce it to behave in a
less domineering way. Thanks to Ernie Eban for pointing me to this
link. |
Column of
15
July 2001
.................................. |
Links
for column of 08
July 2001
......................................... |
| Clay
Shirky, one of the most perceptive Internet commentators around, has
written several insightful articles on the 3G madness. Here's one.
And another.
And yet another. |
The
Economist has been admirably acerbic about the Telcos' 3G
gamble from the beginning. Here's a
brisk editorial on the subject. And here's a piece on the
technical and other difficulties of rolling out 3G networks. |
|
Links
for column of 01
July 2001
.................................... |
| Cass
Sunstein's Home Page is here.
Interestingly, it includes links to people who do not agree with him
-- though it seems that he might have been encouraged to do this by
some negative vibes! |
This
is the site he did for the book. There are also some
favourable reviews, and some critical
ones. |
Eight
years ago Sunstein published Democracy
and the Problem of Free Speech (Free Press, 1993). He's also
co-authored a
book (with Martha Nussbaum) on human cloning, |
Links
for Column of 24
June 2001
..................................... |
| For
an account of the 'Honeypot' experiment see Bruce Schneier's piece here,
or this
piece from ZD news. There was also an
informative piece in the New York Times which linked Steve
Gibson's account of the security holes in Windows XP with the
San Diego research into DDOS.
The most illuminating books I've
found on the centrality of IP in the digital age are James Boyle's Shamans,
Software and Spleen and Lawrence Lessig's Code: and other
laws of Software (Basic Books, 1999). Here's the first
chapter of the Lessig work. James Boyle maintains a
good list of his publications on his home
page.
|
The
paper describing the UCSD research into the extent of DDOS attacks
is here
but you will need the (free) Adobe
Acrobat Reader to view it.
For details of Ross Anderson's
magisterial book, plus a sample chapter, see here.
Bruce Schneier wrote the foreword.
For details of Schneier's own book on security, Secrets and Lies,
see here. Need
a firewall? There are various starter products available on the Net
and elsewhere -- see this,
for example. Or this. |
Links
for column of 17
June 2001
...................................................... |
| Interactive
Week carried a
wonderful column by Connie Guglielmo explaining the Smart
Tags concept and sending it up brilliantly. "Microsoft is
considering adding a feature to Windows XP (link to Microsoft XP
order info page), due out Oct. 25, that would take users to links
predetermined by Microsoft (link to favorable article about
Microsoft). The Smart Tags feature automatically scans the Web pages
that a Windows XP user browses, and then inserts new links beneath
certain words, like the names of companies, products or whatever. If
the user clicks on that Microsoft-created link (link to Bill Gates'
speech on how Microsoft innovation benefits consumers), a new
browser window opens with more links to Microsoft owned-sites (links
to MSN, HotMail, Microsoft.com and Expedia.com) or other sites and
Web pages chosen by the company." |
The
Smart Tags story was first
broken by Walter Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal.
Here's a
terrific column by Dan Gillmor of the San Jose Mercury News
about how Microsoft's appetite for world domination remains
undimmed.
And here's a
nice spoof image of Smart Tags in action.
According to a source who ought to
know, Smart Tags will be disabled by default -- i.e. users will have
to switch on the feature. Phew! We'll see on October 25 when the
final copies ship.
Grisly details department: Steve
Gibson's analysis of the security risks raised by Windows XP starts here
and continues here.
|
Links
for column of 10
June 2001
....................................... |
| LinuxUser
magazine originally broke the story. The article is here.
Here's the Microsoft
Press Release crowing about their capture of the government's
flagship site.
|
There
was a
typically abrasive article about the Gateway in The Register
-- the online magazine which describes itself as 'the hand that
bites IT'!
Try the 'Gateway'
site for yourself. But make sure you have the right operating
system and browser!
Dell has
been crowing about its sterling contribution to the Gateway.
(Warning: it's a 655 kb .pdf document and you will need Acrobat
Reader to see it.) |
Alan
Mather, of the e-Envoy's office, made this
response to some of the criticisms of the Gateway site. He says:
"Work is beginning on providing extended browser support on a wider variety of operating systems....What we have concentrated upon is making this world-leading initiative available to as many as possible as quickly as possible."
And the e-Envoy himself was so
annoyed by my column about the Gateway site that he penned this
response.
|
| Column of 03
June 2001 |
Links
for Column of 27 May 2001
..................................................... |
| For
a summary of the Forrester report, see their
site. |
Clay
Shirky has written a number of very insightful articles on the
significance of the Peer-to-peer revolution. See here
for a good example. Tim O'Reilly has also published an
intriguing 'meme map' in which he tries to position P2P in a
wider context. |
The
best book on P2P is Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of
Disruptive Technologies, edited by Andy Oram and published by O'Reilly
Associates. The publisher is organising another
conference on P2P in September. |
Links
for column
of 20
May 2001
.................................................... |
| For
an entertaining analysis of why the PC's days are numbered, see
Donald A Norman's book
The Invisible Computer, MIT Press, 1998. |
| Column of 13
May 2001 |
Links
for column of 06
May 2001
..................................................... |
| Microsoft
seems to be getting really rattled about the Open Source
movement. Here's a
speech by Craig Mundie, a senior Vice-President of the company,
attacking the movement, and in particular its
central licensing philosophy. |
Andrew
Leonard, an expert on the Open Source movement, wrote
a nice piece in Salon debunking Mundie's arguments.
And John Markoff of the New York Times wrote
up a telephone interview he conducted with Mundie the day before
his speech to the Stern School of Business at New York University. |
In a
nice piece about Microsoft's increasing irritation with Open
Source, the Economist published an acute dissection of the
essence of the company's position on the issue.
|
Links
for column of 29
April 2001
...................................................... |
| Here's
the
text of Edward Felten's statement, explaining why he and his
colleagues did not feel able to present the paper outlining the
results of their research into digital watermarks. |
Predictably,
though, the text of the paper leaked
onto the Net.
The whole thing started with an Open
Letter from the SDMI folks challenging the computer science
community to remove the watermarks. The RIAA later denied that
it had threatened the scientists, but the letter, written by Matthew
Oppenheim, head of litigation for the Recording Industry Association
of America, reads in part: "Any disclosure of information
gained from participating in the public challenge would be outside
the scope of activities permitted by the agreement and could subject
you and your research team to actions under the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act."
Here is some
background from the Princeton scientists on the whole affair. |
The
scandal has been covered extensively in some media outlets.
Here's is the BBC
Online report. And here is John
Markoff's piece from the New York Times. (Free
registration required.)
Thanks to the many readers who
pointed out that it is the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)
not the RIAA that is suing the computer magazine '2600' for
publishing the DeCSS code. Mea culpa: but it's difficult to
get so much as a cigarette-paper between the MPAA and the RIAA
positions on intellectual property.
|
| Column of 22
April 2001 |
| Column of 15
April 2001 |
| Column of 8
April 2001 |
| Column of 1
April 2001 |
Links
for column of 25
March 2001
........................................................ |
| Here
is Microsoft's
announcement of Hailstorm |
Hailstorm
was subjected to, er, a hailstorm of media comment. Here's Wired's
coverage. And Dan Gillmor's sceptical
observations (from his WebLog). |
And
an insightful
piece from one of Bill Gates's local papers. |
Links
for column of 18
March 2001
....................................................... |
| The
Patent Office decision on software patents and business
method/process patents is reported here. |
Larry
Lessig has written widely about business process patents. Here
is one
of his columns from the Industry Standard. |
|
| Column of 11
March 2001 |
Link
for column of 4
March 2001
.................................................... |
| There's
an excellent short biography of Claude Shannon here. |
Correction
for column of 25
February 2001
..................................................................... |
| Note:
the claim in this week's published column that Hotmail still runs on
Open Source software is incorrect. Hotmail ran on BSD
Unix when Microsoft bought the company and continued on that basis
for some time. It now runs on Microsoft IIS and Windows
2000. I did spot the error before publication, but my attempt
to correct it obviously failed. :-( |
| Column of 18
February 2001 |
| Column of 11
February 2001 |
| Column of 4
February 2001 |
|
Column of 28 January 2001 (Not on Observer server, for some obscure
reason.) |
| Column of 21
January 2001 |
| Column of 14
January 2001 |
| Column of 7
January 2001 |