| Reading
this using Microsoft Internet Explorer? Can I tactfully
suggest you consider switching to a
more secure, modern browser? Firefox is free and
runs on everything -- including Windows.
Links
for column of December
19
..............................................
Mercury
News report of the Google project is here.
New York Times version here.
The Detroit Free Press (on whose beat the University
of Michigan lies) ran a
nice piece by Mike Wendland. And here's some
information on Google Print.
Column
of December
12
..................................
Links
for column of December
05
...............................................
The USA
Today report of the 'honey-pot' experiment is here.
The ArsTechnica account is here.
Avantgarde's report is here.
TechWeb also covered
the story.
The
most vivid quote I saw came from Marcus Colombano of Avantgarde:
"The average was just four minutes. Think about that. Plug
in a new PC -- and many are still sold with Windows XP SP1 --
to a DSL line, go get a cup of coffee, and come back to find
your machine has been taken." [Note: I don't think 'average'
is right -- my reading of the results suggests that four minutes
was the quickest time-to-compromise.]
ZoneAlarm
can be downloaded (free for personal use) from here.
Links
for column of November
28
...............................................
Update!
The US Senate has met and pared down the IPPA, removing some
of the wilder sections (like the bit that would have turned
the Department of Justice into the litigation department of
the music and movie companies). The result: what Wired
calls
"a kinder, gentler, copyright bill". Phew! (provisionally,
because the effects of IP law often only surface much later)
For
a memorable account of the ongoing battle between technology
and the copyright industries, see Ed Felten's terrific President's
Lecture at Princeton. And for a masterful analysis of the
ludicrous way we currently make IP law, see this
column by James Boyle in the Financial Times.
Links
for column of November
21
...............................................
For
an account of Sainsburys' IT woes, see this
report. Alastair Darling's concerns about the CSA's IT system
were first
reported in 2002. More on the CSA's woes here,
here
and here.
The report into Cambridge University's disastrous CAPSA IT system
is here.
Links
for column of November
07
..............................................
For
a good summary by Information Week of the MessageLabs
warning about new-style phishing, see here.
For a BBC report on the travails of LloydsTSB customers, see
here.
NatWest's experience is chronicled here.
An excellent White Paper on Phishing can be downloaded (in pdf
format, 1.8 MB) from here.
For information on how to disable Windows Scripting Host see
here.
My
Open University group has a
new online course on viruses, worms, phishing, spam and
related menaces. It's designed to help people understand the
problem and teaches them how to protect themselves from 'malware'.
Links
for column of
October
31
...........................................
The
OGC Report can be found here.
LinuxJournal has published a usefully sceptical
analysis of it. For an accessible primer on the Whig Interpretation
of history, see this
site. Silicon.com claims to have seen a pre-release Word
version of the report, with 'track changes' enabled. They claim
that the favourable comments on Open Source software were 'sexed
down' by civil servants to preserve a semblance of impartiality
vis-a-vis proprietary software!
Audio
version of this column.
Links
for column of October
24
...........................................
The
New York Times has an
interesting article on what it calls eBay's "power
sellers". Quote: "An estimated half-million people
make a full- or part-time living by auctioning everything from
macramé to Maseratis on the Internet. In the online auction
world, they are called power sellers, and they have succeeded
by researching consumer trends, finding reliable sources for
goods and not sparing the bubble wrap."
Links
for column of October
17
...........................................
Audio
version of this column.
The
Guardian report of the Indymedia seizure is here.
The Bits of Freedom researchers have produced a fascinating
report of their experiment with Dutch ISPs (as a pdf file).
Update
(18th October): The FBI has apparently returned
the confiscated servers.
Links
for column of October 10
...........................................
Correction:
it's the British Phonographic Industry, not (as I had
it) the British Phonographic Society.
BBC
report of the new initiative by the British record industry
is here.
Simpson Garfinkel wrote a nice, insightful piece
about P2P in MIT's Technology Review. The Pew report
on music downloading can be found here
(in pdf format). For a report of the Appeal Court's judgment
in the Grokster/Morpheus case, see here.
On Friday last, the RIAA/MPAA announced
their intention to take the case to the Supreme Court.
Audio
version of this column.
Links
for column of October
03
............................................
News
of the JPEG vulnerability here.
And here's
a report of its appearance on the Net. Coincidentally, the New
York Times is running a
piece by James Fallows this morning which is partly about
alternatives to IE.
Forbes
Magazine has finally
noticed that IE has serious competition. Quote:
"The
world of Web browsing has reached a tipping point. Microsoft's
Internet Explorer browser has been and remains the de facto
standard for Internet users. But for the first time since the
late '90s, when Redmond quashed Netscape, Microsoft has some
real competition.
Alternative browsers have been around for years, including Netscape,
which was long ago absorbed by the Time Warner conglomerate.
The popular open source browser Mozilla is based on Netscape,
a program called Opera has a following, and Apple Computer has
its own browser, dubbed Safari.
But there's a new browser from the makers of Mozilla, called
Firefox, that's getting lots of attention -- and not just from
the geeky set. The Mozilla Foundation open source project, which
is funded by Time Warner, IBM and Sun Microsystems, launched
Firefox version 0.9 on June 15. Firefox 1.0 is due out by early
November.
Internet users began switching in earnest during the summer
after several security problems emerged with IE, which of course
is built into Microsoft's ubiquitous Windows operating system.
Microsoft issued a patch for Windows XP, that platform's most
recent iteration, but users complain that IE hasn't truly been
updated since 2001. Anyone using Windows 98 or Windows 2000
who wants the most secure system has to upgrade to XP and download
the patch, called Service Pack 2."
Read
Charles Cooper on "Why
I dumped Internet Explorer".
Another
interesting aspect of IE's stagnation is that it provided
third-party developers with numerous opportunities to develop
products which enhanced the Microsoft product. For some, this
was lucrative. But now, as frustrated users eventually start
migrating to other products, these third-party developers are
getting
worried.
Still
more: Marc Andreessen (who
co-wrote Mosaic and co-founded Netscape) speaking
on the issue:
"One
of the most amazing things over the last six or seven years
is watching Microsoft basically get a monopoly over the browser
and then not use it," he said.
Increasing pressure from alternative browsers such as Firefox
and Opera (Overview, Articles, Company) will ultimately cause
Microsoft to take a second look at the browser and how it can
better be used to leverage Microsoft's monopoly, Andreessen
said.
"Microsoft is certainly going to respond competitively
to these things. I can guarantee that," he said. "I
think that it is quite possible that this is going to get very
interesting over the next two or three years," he said.
Links
for column of September
26
................................................
The
original Brennan post is here.
Marc Tobias's site is here.
Ed Felten's commentary is here.
BikeBiz's article is here.
Links to video can be found here.
Media outlets which covered the story included Wired
News, the New
York Times and the Boston
Globe.
Links
for column of September
19
................................................
The
transcript of Pat Gelsinger's keynote is here.
Intel's Press release summarising his keynote is here.
PlanetLab's home page is here.
Links
for column of September
12
................................................
Ed
Felten's Blog
entries on Wikipedia.
Links
for
column of September
05
.................................................
The
latest Pew Internet report on IM is here.
PC World magazine published a useful "Grown-Up's
Guide to Instant Messaging" in March 2004. You can find
it here.
Links
for column of August
29
...........................................
Nice
allegorical essay by John Kay looking back at the 3G auctions.
My thoughts about cocktail parties and spectrum scarcity were
prompted by this
essay in the Economist.
Column
for August
22
...............................
No
columns for August 08 and 15 (well, even columnists have holidays)
........................................................................................................
Column
for August
01
...............................
Links
for column of July
25
.....................................
There's
a terrific
analysis by Floyd Norris of the taxation aspect of the Microsoft
bonanza in the International Herald Tribune. The Economist's
kindly piece is here.
Links
for column of July
18
.......................................
There's
a stray character in the Observer's link to the Register
story. The correct link is to this.
Links
for column of July
11
......................................
The
statistics for UK spam came in too late to make the print edition
of my column. They reveal that things have worsened even more
than I had supposed.
According
to MessageLabs, a leading anti-spam company, UK spam figures
for Apr-Jun are:
April - 52%
May - 49%
June - 61%
So,
despite the legislation, spam is still increasing.
MessageLabs's global spam figures are even more sobering:
Jan - 63%
Feb - 59.9%
Mar - 52.8%
April - 67.6%
May - 76%
June - 86.3%
So another huge surge in the amount of spam in June - up
10% from May. In June MessageLabs scanned 917,613,868
emails on behalf if its customers, of which 791,776,652
were stopped as spam. This translates to 86.3%, or 1 in 1.16.
Many
thanks to Pauline Gillingham for providing the numbers.
Mark
Sunner, Chief Technology Officer at MessageLabs, says As
the proportion of spam in corporate and home inboxes continues
to grow exponentially, theres a direct correlation to
regional demographic trends. The US presents the widest market
for spammers in terms of Internet access and adoption of email
as a communications tool. While it currently has the worst global
figure at 83%, its only a matter of time until the UK
falls victim to similar volumes in around six-months time, whilst
Asia-Pacific countries will likely see the same impact in 12
months time. When it comes to the Internet, when the US sneezes,
the rest of us catch a cold.
Countries where English is a widely used language, particularly
in electronic communication, will always be a natural target
for spammers as mass mailing in one common language is by far
the easiest way for them to disperse their messages. It is therefore
no coincidence that the majority of spam also originates from
English speaking countries. These latest figures show spam is
becoming a bigger problem worldwide, and unfortunately shows
that current legislation is having little impact in curbing
the upward trend.
Spamhaus
(a terrific and courageous organisation IMHO) is here.
Column
of July
04
..........................
(Oh,
and I also wrote a
piece for the Review section of the paper about
the proposed new music downloads charts.)
Links
for column of June
27
......................................
Demos
publications are available from here.
Manuel Castells's latest book is The
Internet Galaxy.
Links
for column of June
20
.......................................
Windows
users can download iTunes software from here.
(And it's free.) The catalogue of the UK iTunes store is still
a bit thin compared with its US counterpart. There are various
reasons for this (I hear) but they are all about difficulties
in negotiating rights with record labels. Some small independent
labels are complaining that Apple is offering them terms which
are distinctly ungenerous. That wouldn't surprise me. Apple
may be an excellent company, but it drives hard bargains. Ask
the folks in China who manufacture the iPod!
Links
for column of June
13
.......................................
For
background to the draft treaty (including links to PDF copy
etc.) see Corante.
The Public
Knowledge site has lots of useful commentaries, especially
from NGOs. There's a wonderful, legalistic, scholarly critique
of the draft by some Oxford academics. And finally, re Edmund
Burke's observation about evil triumphing when good men do nothing,
there have been two good men and one good woman in Geneva all
week -- Cory Doctorow and David Tannenbaum, and Wendy Seltzer
. Their daily
reporting of the proceedings have been just about the only
enjoyable aspect of the WIPO event.
Links
for column of June
06
.......................................
Eric
Raymond's essay "Homesteading the Noosphere" is here.
His famous essay on Linux, "The Cathedral and the bazaar"
is here.
Steve Weber's Home Page is here.
His book is published by Harvard
University Press (you can download an excerpt in pdf format).
An index of reviews to date can be found here.
Links
for column of May
30
......................................
Nicholas
Carr's home page is here.
For a page listing some responses to his article see here.
CIO magazine ran an
interview with him. Don Tapscott wrote a rebuttal
of his thesis (it's a pdf file).
No
column on May 23
................................
No
column on May 16
...............................
Links
for column of May
09
......................................
The
Rubin analysis of Diebold code is here.
There's an InfoWorld
report of some of this work. Also an AP
summary published in the Guardian. For accounts of the Walden
O'Dell's donation to the Bush campaign see, e.g. this
USA Today report. Here
is a report by the Christian Science Monitor on the
California decision not to use voting machines.
Links
for column of May
02
......................................
The
Google prospectus is on the Securities and Exchange Commission's
site -- here.
Maths
background to e is here.
Links
for column of April
25
........................................
Simpson
Garfinkel's article is here.
Links to the talk given by Google's technology supremo, Urs
Hoelzle, to the University of Washingon at Seattle on November
5th 2003 can be found here.
Links
for column of April
18
.......................................
Adam
Laurie is the Chief Security Officer at a British company, AL
Digital. "Before we deploy any new technology for clients or
our own staff", he told C-Net,
"one of my duties is to investigate that technology and ensure
it is secure--actually rolling your sleeves up and looking at
it, not just taking the manufacturers' claims at face value.
When I did that, I found that it is not secure," he said.
Laurie found
that phones are vulnerable to "bluesnarfing," in which an attacker
exploits a flaw to read, modify and copy a phone's address book
and calendar without leaving any trace of the intrusion. The
flaw affects a number of Sony Ericsson, Ericsson and Nokia handsets
(including my benighted T68i), but some models--including a
handful of Nokia phones--are at greater risk because they invite
attack even when in "invisible mode" -- i.e. when they are supposed
not to be broadcasting their presence. For the grisly details,
see the web page
he has prepared.
On
Wednesday last (April 14) the London Times carried the
article by Steve Boggan, who went out on the streets with
Adam Laurie and found that Bluesnarfing was indeed as easy as
Laurie had claimed. It was also intriguing to see the differences
between the two main companies affected. Sony-Ericsson put up
a feeble spokesbot who first tried to downplay the problem.
Nokia, in contrast, were more forthcoming. When quizzed by C-Net,
they acknowledged
that some of their phones were vulnerable, but claimed that
an attack was only possible if the Bluetooth was in 'visible'
mode. (Wrong, according to Laurie, for some models.) The Nokia
spokesman also volunteered some extraordinary news:
If
an attacker had physical access to a 7650 model, a bluesnarf
attack would not only be possible, but it would also allow the
attacker's Bluetooth device to "read the data on the attacked
device and also send SMS messages and browse the Web via it."
Way
back in 2000, security expert Bruce Schneier wrote
this:
"Bluetooth
is a short-range radio communcations protocol that lets pieces
of computer hardware communicate with each other. It's an eavesdropper's
dream. Eavesdrop from up to 300 feet away with normal equipment,
and probably a lot further if you try. Eavesdrop on the CRT
and a lot more. Listen as a computer communicates with a scanner,
printer, or wireless LAN. Listen as a keyboard communicates
with a computer. (Whose password do you want to capture today?)
Is anyone developing a Bluetooth-enabled smart card reader?
What amazes me is the dearth of information about the security
of this protocol. I'm sure someone has thought about it, a team
designed some security into Bluetooth, and that those designers
believe it to be secure. But has anyone reputable examined the
protocol? Is the implementation known to be correct? Are there
any programming errors? If Bluetooth is secure, it will be the
first time ever that a major protocol has been released without
any security flaws. I'm not optimistic.
And what about privacy? Bluetooth devices regularly broadcast
a unique ID. Can that be used to track someone's movements?
The stampede towards Bluetooth continues unawares. Expect all
sorts of vulnerabilities, patches, workarounds, spin control,
and the like. And treat Bluetooth as a broadcast protocol, because
that's what it is."
Links
for column of April
11
.......................................
You
can check domain-name ownership here.
The Media Post profile of Wunderman Interactive is here.
Links
for column of April
04
.......................................
This
is allegedly a screenshot of the Google email service in action.
Can't vouch for it, but the image is all over the web. The first
review I've seen is here.
Column
of March
28
.............................
Column
of March
21
.............................
The
Guardian report of HEFCE's decision is here.
HEFCE's own announcement is here.
The e-U's er, taciturn, response is here.
The company accounts are available online from Companies
House for a modest (£4) fee.
Links
for column of March
14
.........................................
The
Shorenstein Case Study is available here.
It comes in the form of a watermarked, highly circumscribed
pdf file with fierce warnings about not copying or quoting,
but at least you can read it online!
Links
for column of March
07
........................................
How
BitTorrent works: see here
for a nice diagram. News.Com reported
the Lindows decision to use BitTorrent. Paul Boutin wrote a
nice piece in Slate about the technology.
Links
for column of February
29
.............................................
Wade
Roush wrote a terrific article
on search engine competition in MIT's Technology Review.
You need to subscribe to read it, but subscription is free and
well worth the effort because it's a great publication.
How
Teoma works: "Teoma uses document clustering to
sort its results for its users. As it crawls pages, it
bins them by topic, so that on your result page, in addition
to a list of links is a list of clusters under the Refine
heading. Each cluster heading, when you click on it, yields
sites in that bin and potentially more suggested refinements.
For example, if you wanted to learn about Snow College but couldnt
remember where it was or if it might be called Snow University,
try typing snow into teoma. One of the suggestions under
refine will be Snow College, and by
clicking on this link, you can avoid having to wade through
sites about snow reports, ski resorts, snow leopards, Snow Dogs,
snow cones, and a host of other sites you care nothing about.
Teoma does this by showing which pages it has put into its snow
college bin. Thus it can have a dramatically positive
effect on a users ability to retrieve relevant information
by sorting and clustering sites by topics". [Source.]
How
Mooter works: "Mooter analyses the choices you
make while searching, then reorders the results based on what
you are actually looking for at that moment without you having
to go back and rephrase your exact needs.
So instead of giving users long lists of scrambled results,
Mooter displays simple, sensible categories of information.
As users search, the algorithms shuffle the results in the background,
ensuring that more relevant results are displayed.
Mooter clusters results into concepts, allowing faster decisions
and deeper digging with less clicks. As you work, the Mooter
algorithms shuffle the results invisibly so that more relevant
results to you at the moment come up first. This means
that no two searches are the same for two different people -
you are looking for something completely different to the person
next to you, so even using the same original keyword your results
will not come up in exactly the same way." [Source.]
Column
of February
22
...................................
Bill
Gates wrote an
article in the Washington Post outlining the views
he expressed
at Davos. The Economist ran a
good article on the spam problem last week. (Unfortunately
you will need a subscription to access the full text online.)
Examples of the economists' approach to spam can be found here.
An interesting
filtering approach comes from analysing your inbox to build
a network of friends -- which unfailingly identifies 50% of
spammed messages (leaving the rest for other types of filter).
The scientific journal Nature carried a
good article about this also. For a critical account of
how the US can-spam act is doing, see here.
Column
of February
15
...................................
Dan
Hill's essay on Apple's design philosophy is here.
One of the other thoughts prompted by it is about the way general
ideas about design cross disciplinary boundaries. For example,
the Berkeley architect Christopher Alexander is famous for his
concept of 'pattern
languages' -- which evolved from his study of the architectural
'patterns' that have evolved in response to the age-old need
to design living spaces, but which have proved an inspiration
for designers
of computer software and information systems.
Column
of February
08
...................................
Details
of the conference on 'delivering adult content responsibly'
are here.
Column
of February
01
...................................
This
week's Economist has a
very good piece about Microsoft's difficulties with the
European Commission. Details of Gordon Brown's 'enterprise'
conference are here.
Column
of January
25
................................
Good
exegesis of Googlebombing here.
The definitive site on Googlewhacking is here.
The New York Times piece is here
(but will transform itself into a mere abstract -- with payment
for the full piece -- after a time). Adam Mathes's page on his
Pressman jape is here.
Column
of January
18
................................
The
winning ads in the 'Bush in 30 Seconds' competition are here.
Frank Rich's New York Times column of December 29 is
here.
Column
of January
11
...................................
Column
of January
04
........................................
|